Hi folks,
I am working on BW 7.4 SP 5 System on a HANA DB SP7 (the testenvironment with BO 4.1 Sp2 from CAL).
I connected the underlying HANA DB as an ODP System and tried to consume some of the EPM views as DataSources in BW. Everything looks fine, except that the DataSource fields have assigned units/currencies where there shouldnt be any.
Pos. 2 for example has asigned APPROVALSTATUSDE which is field Pos. 1 etc....
Can anyone help?
Thx.
Markus
Hi Everyone,
I want to know that if an interrupt in a process chain is already created, how do i check what are the conditions for that interrupt to go green in my process chain.
Thank You
Arjun Khurana
Hi all,
I am new to SAP BW .
while learning the concepts , i cam across the term PSA .
Can you some one explain PSA how different it is from Database ( if BW is using HANA).
Hello experts!
I met a strange issue while creating generic datasource based on view.
In the view I added a field "MANDT" as our customer asked us. then in RSO2, I created a datasource and saved it. After I click the save button, in the pop-up dialog box, the field MANDT is missing..
Then I copied the meta data in BW system.It is strange that the MANDT field is missing either but the index for fields in datasource began from no.2..
Can someone help me on this ?
thanks a lot !
view:
ds in bw:
Hi experts,
could you suggest me an tool for custom end user training ?
Thanks.
Andrea
Hi Champs,
We successfully moved a BW ADSO transport from Dev to QUA01 successfully and eventually to Production Box.
However We are trying to move a BW ADSO transport from Development to Quality02 as part of retrofit but ended with following errors.
This issue is prevailing since a month and really need your expertise at the earliest.
Thank you all
Hi Experts,
I have created an ADSO using template Corporate Memory, loaded some data and activated the request. Now I am trying to delete this request from ADSO but not able to do so. All I can see is information message as below. What is the process for request deletion, please help.
Regards
Jitendra
Hello,
What is the Difference Between ODP-SAP(Extractors) And ODP-SLT Queue Source System in SAP BW 7.5
ODP-SAP :- To Get Real Time Data From Standard SAP Extractors And Generic Extractors.
ODP-SLT Queue :- Only TABLE & Views are Used For Real Time Data And Other Non-SAP System also Supported For Real Time Data.
For ODP-SAP Standard Extractors in ECC Sources System PI_BASIS 7.40 and Above Packages Are Required?
How to Get Real Time Data From ECC as SAP Standard Extractor or Generic Extractors in ODP-SAP Source System?
HI Experts,
As per my sense, in SAP BW7.4 on HANA, creation of DIM IDs no longer required.
Recently we have migrated and upgraded SAP BW 7.0 in to SAP BW 7.4 on HANA. Now I have converted one cube in to HANA Optimized Cube, but still I am seeing DIM IDs in this cube.
Can you let me know the reason.
Thanks,
Suresh.
Hi,
What should be the benchmark for avg. dialog response time in a BW on HANA system? I know in OLTP systems its 1 sec but for BW systems on a traditional database it usually hovers around 2 sec. But what is the ideal avg. dialog response time of a BW system on HANA database. In our system its around 2 sec where the DB response time is around 800 ms - 1 sec. As per SAP standard the DB response time should be less than 40% of the dialog response time which we have. But as per HANA standard should we expect much lesser DB response time?
Thanks,
Arindam
Hi
We are performing the SAP BW Migration to HANA using the SUM DMO option.
SUM SP14 Patch 9
Current Phase: Downtime
Module: MAIN_SWITCH/SUBMOD_MIG_SWITCH_ORG/SUBMOD_MIG_DOWNTIME_RUN/EU_CLONE_MIG_DT_CRC_RUN
This is this first cycle, and the option "compare all tables" were selected. This option should not be used for the other cycles, Just the first one.
We are on that phase EU_CLONE_MIG_DT_CRC_RUN where it is checking the tables from source (Oracle) and target (HANA).
The problem we are facing is that it is just running for to long, Started Feb17 00:00 and as per log today is on ONLY 29% as you can see in the log below. At this pace will never finish.
Does anyone know how can we skip this task? Speed up some how? Anybody face that problem before?
As per log below the SUM tool reads 925 tasks from file 'MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK.BUC'. As per log below is on task 329 of 925.
I was thinking if maybe I edit the MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK.BUC and delete all the tasks there below task 331. That way SUM would execute until tasks 331 and proceed next phase ( I hope). Like a way to CUT the number of check SUM this to do. The concern is if the SUM tool will understand that and proceed? Or it might complain where are the missing tasks? or will this jeopardize the whole migration process, corrupting SUM execution? Does anyone try to manipulate that file before?
Follow the a piece of the LOG
1 ETQ201 Entering upgrade-phase "MAIN_SWITCH/SUBMOD_MIG_SWITCH_ORG/SUBMOD_MIG_DOWNTIME_RUN/EU_CLONE_MIG_DT_CRC_RUN" ("20160217003415")
2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '50', GwService = 'sapgw50' Client = '000'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_ora_schema=SAPSR3
1 ETQ200 Executing actual phase 'MAIN_SWITCH/SUBMOD_MIG_SWITCH_ORG/SUBMOD_MIG_DOWNTIME_RUN/EU_CLONE_MIG_DT_CRC_RUN'.
1 ETQ399 Phase arguments:
2 ETQ399 Arg[0] = 'EUCLONEDEFS.LST'
2 ETQ399 Arg[1] = 'MIGRATE_DOWNTIME_NOMIGTRIG'
2 ETQ399 Arg[2] = 'migrate_dt_crc'
2 ETQ399 Arg[3] = 'RUN_ONLY;CHECKCRC_ONLY;DEST_NOCREATE;REPAIRMAYCLONE;DESTSECONDDB;SEL4DOWNTIME'
1 ETQ399 Using error summary log 'EUMIGRATEDTCRCRUN.ELG'.
4 ETQ399 Using '-table_suffix' option of R3load.
2 ETQ399 Read 9 entries from '/usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/bin/EUCLONEDEFS.LST'.
1 ETQ000 ==================================================
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20160217003415
1 ETQ399 Read 925 tasks from 'MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK.BUC' in directory 'migrate_dt_crc', now running export+import side.
2 ETQ399 Using dynamically number of R3load processes.
3 ETQ399 Fixing bucket task states.
.
.
.
.
3 ETQ399 ============= 2016/02/19 04:23:14, Progress 2393892 MB/8105492 MB (29.53%) ===================
3 ETQ121 20160219042315 #698 (144): PID 27573 execute '/usr/sap/PBB/SUM/abap/bin/SAPuptool crctable /usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/migrate_dt_crc/MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00320__BIC_DZBIL_C0055_EXP.CRC /usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/migrate_dt_crc/MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00320__BIC_DZBIL_C0055_IMP.CRC logfile=/usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/migrate_dt_crc/MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00320__BIC_DZBIL_C0055_EXP.LOG' in background, output written to '/usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/log/R3LDCALLRUN.698'.
3 ETQ123 20160219042317 (143): PID 27573 exited with status 0 (time 2.000 real)
3 ETQ399 ============= 2016/02/19 04:23:17, Progress 2394868 MB/8105492 MB (29.55%) ===================
3 ETQ121 20160219042317 #699 (144): PID 27574 execute '/usr/sap/PBB/SUM/abap/bin/SAPuptool crctable /usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/migrate_dt_crc/MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00329__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC /usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/migrate_dt_crc/MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00329__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC logfile=/usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/migrate_dt_crc/MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00329__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.LOG' in background, output written to '/usr/sap/PB1/SUM/abap/log/R3LDCALLRUN.699'.
A piece of MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK.BUC file
chkcrc: refid=00328__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00328__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00328__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00329__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00329__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00329__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00330__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00330__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00330__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00331__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00331__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00331__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00332__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00332__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00332__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00333__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00333__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00333__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00334__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00334__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00334__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00335__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00335__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00335__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00336__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00336__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00336__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=8055517
chkcrc: refid=00337__BIC_AZFGL_O0200 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00337__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00337__BIC_AZFGL_O0200_IMP.CRC size=1031031
chkcrc: refid=00338__BIC_AZFGL_O0300 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00338__BIC_AZFGL_O0300_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00338__BIC_AZFGL_O0300_IMP.CRC size=8055606
chkcrc: refid=00339__BIC_AZFGL_O0300 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00339__BIC_AZFGL_O0300_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00339__BIC_AZFGL_O0300_IMP.CRC size=8055606
chkcrc: refid=00340__BIC_AZFGL_O0300 export=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00340__BIC_AZFGL_O0300_EXP.CRC import=MIGRATE_DT_CRC_CHK_00340__BIC_AZFGL_O0300_IMP.CRC size=8055606
Rod
Hi,
We are currently running on BW on Hana (7.4) and Hana native on a single DB and instance.
Bw is primarly used for BPC and native for non sap datasources loaded via BODS. We are having runtime license for BW and 256 GB of base edition license for native.
Now with the real BW implementation takes place (SAP datasources), we're going to need to upgrade our hardware to 2TB just for the BW portion. We're intending to leverage the BW generated HANA views with existing hana views for BI reporting.
My concern is the license whereby although BW runtime allowed us to get as much memory, the 50% rule for a single instance means we will need to acquire 1TB (2TB hardware) of base licenses although our current sizing for native is only at 256GB, which I think is not very cost effective although having all in instance would work best.
Therefore, would it be ideal to split the instances to 2 (BW and native) so we could have 2TB or more in Bw and BPC and remain 256 GB in native?
Another concern would be the BW generated hana views. By splitting instances means we wouldn't be able to use this anymore (since there is no hana native license for BW)? I know alternatively we could use the import Bw models in studio to achieve the same but it would be more of a 'pull' instead of 'push'.
Our environments are running on Vm if this could help.
Appreciate any thoughts on this.
Cheers
Hi Experts,
There is a custom field in standard core code block, which reflects in FAGLFLEXT table but the same field is not reflected in 0FI_GL_10 extractor ?
Same field is available in 0FI_GL_14 extractor (BSEG/FAGLFLEXA) and the Line Item Extractor shows the custom field.
Regards,
Bhawick
Hi all,
I am working bw on hana standard inventory model and i have installed Composite infoprovider /IMO_D_MMIM03 and i loaded with data as per help.sap.com
but finally my standard query STOCK Overview gives result zero stock and i checked in my transformations not mapped for key fig and i am not sure why ,please help me on this
I work in 7.4 sps13
thanks
siva
Hi Guys,
Does anyone experience having a target infoprov as WOPT using SAP HANA Execution DTP?
How where you able to handle duplicate records since SAP HANA Execution type of DTP disables semantic key and error stack?
We are going to apply NLS ang this might be an issue when we decide to use this dtp type, then when moving data from HANA DB to NLS, duplication is not detected.
Hello Team,
Recently we have migrated our Dev BW system to HANA.
While doing data loads to partitioned Info Cube the data loadings are getting failed.
This is Error Message:
The error is Error occurred in write_ic for Data Target 0PS_C04
Errors Occurred in UPDATE_INFOCUBE for Data Target 0PS_C04.
If we remove the partitions then we are able to load data without any issues.
As this is only Technical Migration we are not converting any infocubes to Hana Optimized Info cubes and also some of the data flows among the failed Infocubes are in 3.x.
Question 1: What is the behavior of Standard Info Cube which have partitions and not converted to HANA Optimized in BW on HANA system ? Will the Info cube having same partitions as before after migrating to HANA data base?
Question 2: As i said earlier If i remove partition then data loadings are working fine. If this is the solution what would be the impact of queries runtime and will there be any other impacts such as transformations/update rules become in active etc..
Question 3: Another solution may be converting to HANA optmized which in turn deletes the partition while converting. But if i just convert info cubes to hana optimized which have 3.x flows we should also migrate data flows to 7.x flows . For info cubes which have already 7.x flows there will not be any impact if we migrate cubes to hana optmized.
Please suggest some feasible solution. Thanks in Advance
Hello Experts
Is there any table where we can see all fields mapping for Composite provider. Something similar to RSDICMULTIIOBJ.
Hello Experts,
In present design, under one package have 5 calculation views.
I did changes for one calculation view and I wanted to make sure only the changed calculation view is transported instead of all other calculation view.
Thanks,
Surla
Hi Experts,
We are using SAP BW 7.4 on HANA. Now I want to connect MS Sequel server 2008 with SDA.
Can you confirm, will SDA support for MS Sequel server 2008 version?
Thanks,
Suresh.
Dear All,
is there any way to copy copy composite provider? (more like identical structure with different names.)